Article
CZ_Binance repost: RT @binance Update: We have covered 6000000000 USD。
RT @binance: Update: We had already covered $6B of the impacted amount of the hacked loss.
🔗 [Source] https://eqn.news/monitor/10173 ———————————— 2026-11-01 12: 23: 54
Loading…
A Telegram repost stated that Binance had covered 6000000000 USD, but this has not yet been verified.

CZ_Binance repost: RT @binance Update: We have covered 6000000000 USD。
RT @binance: Update: We had already covered $6B of the impacted amount of the hacked loss.
🔗 [Source] https://eqn.news/monitor/10173 ———————————— 2026-11-01 12: 23: 54
A Telegram channel forwarded content labeled “CZ_Binance repost”.
The forwarded content quoted Binance as stating: covered 6000000000 USD。
The content included a source link and timestamp: 2026-11-01 12: 23: 54。
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
The message means that, according to the forwarded claim,Binance stated that it had borne or made up 6000000000 USD the relevant hacking-loss amount. The original text did not specify the incident details, total losses, or source of funds.
6000000000 USD is a substantial amount; if the statement is true, it could involve the platform’s losses and compensation arrangements, but currently there is only forwarded content, which is insufficient for confirmation.
When encountering a report involving a substantial amount, first distinguish between “someone forwarded it” and “it has been officially confirmed,” and verify the original announcement.
Loading event timeline…
This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.
View glossary →This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.
View glossary →This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.
View glossary →