bibibi.ccLoading…
X account @noahcitron discusses the view that, under a quantum-adversary threat model, hash schemes are more conservative than elliptic-curve cryptography; for adversaries using only classical computers,AI there is currently no intuition that hashes are superior.
Probably the most important point here.
Hashing is more conservative than EC from the perspective of a quantum adversary.
For an AI adversary with only classical computers, we have no intuition that hashes are any better.
Similar point can be made for hashes vs lattices too.
Probably the most important point here.
Hashing is more conservative than EC from the perspective of a quantum adversary.
For an AI adversary with only classical computers, we have no intuition that hashes are any better.
Similar point can be made for hashes vs lattices too.
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
The explanation for “X account: Hashing is more conservative than EC from the perspective of a quantum adversary.” is insufficient; the available materials support only a factual excerpt.
Verify the follow-up conditions for this event: whether papers, benchmarks, or cryptographic institutions have provided verifiable explanations of the relevant quantum and AI threat models.
Loading event timeline…