Article
Kimi training AI Boss, General Reasoning trains the entire AI company
Dongcha Beating AI News reported this year that January,Kimi K2.5 launched Agent Swarm, enabling a main Agent to recruit and direct multiple sub-Agents; subsequently,K2.6 expanded the scale to as many as 300 sub-Agents.
However, Kimi’s reinforcement learning method PARL trains only the “boss” responsible for directing, while freezing the sub-Agents. When multiple people complete a task, it is difficult to determine who deserves credit; if everyone adjusts their strategy simultaneously, training can also become unstable.
General Reasoning deliberately tried another approach. The team launched 120B-parameter model Avalon-M1-Mini and proposed RLCR(collective-reward reinforcement learning). It assigns one Agent as the CEO and allows it to recruit up to 8 employees, who collaborate through a message board and shared workspace. All members use the same model, and after the task is completed, they are not assessed individually; instead, they receive reinforcement learning together based on the team’s overall score.
This method achieved continued improvements across 147 training environments and more than 2000000 different tasks. In software tasks, the share of lead engineers among recruited roles rose from 0.4%to approximately 13%; the share of teams conducting at least one peer review increased from 42%to 64%. The division of labor also changed: instead of each person writing part of the code, one person increasingly writes most of it while others test and identify errors. Management layers and quality-control processes that previously required manual design emerged autonomously during training.
However, some of the better team performance was simply because teams used more Token. Giving a single Agent the same output Token allowed researchers to recover about of the team’s scoring advantage. The main benefit of teams is that they can work simultaneously: across 12 evaluations, the estimated time to achieve comparable results averaged only about one-quarter that of a single Agent.
The researchers also simulated this year’s incident in which OpenAI agents attacked Hugging Face. 210 tests, no Agent called the simulated attack tool. However, as training progressed, the proportion reporting anomalies to human evaluators fell from 76.7%to 0; although execution records from 96.7%to 100%had considered reporting. Some Agents chose to raise objections only within the team; others planned to report but never actually acted.
Currently,Avalon-M1-Mini is still undergoing training, and neither the model weights nor the training framework has been open-sourced.