bibibi.ccLoading…
The speaker is more concerned about AI poor-quality code generated by entering production than about AI replacing programmers.
I am more likely to fire a programmer for using AI to generate bad code and land it into prod then because AI displaced a programmer by doing their work.
My brain can only handle a handful of products. I need a CEO/pm per product. Each ceo/pm can only handle a handful of
The speaker said that, compared with AI replacing programmers, he is more likely to fire them for using AI to generate poor-quality code and deploy it to production.
The speaker said that he can manage only a few products.
The speaker said that each product requires a CEO or product manager.
The original text is incomplete at “each CEO or product manager can manage only a few.”
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
This is a personal view concerning responsibility for AI assisted programming and product management span. The speaker believes that, even after using AI to write code, one must still be responsible for code quality and the outcome of its release.
It reminds readers that the use of AI programming tools may involve code quality, release reviews, and the allocation of responsibility. The specific management policies are not explained in the original text.
AI can help generate code, but the generated code still needs to be reviewed before entering production; product leads also have limits on the number of products they can manage.
Loading event timeline…
This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.
View glossary →This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.
View glossary →This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.
View glossary →