Bitcoin block 974961 included 11,255 transactions, the second-highest on record
BIBIBI
AT A GLANCE
Bitcoin block 974961 contained 11,255 transactions; the report stated that its count ranked second in history.
Article
Bitcoin block #974961 contains 11,255 transactions, making it the block with the second-highest transaction count
PANews November 9 reported that, according to Bitcoin.com News, Bitcoin block mined by Antpool 974961 included 11,255 transactions, becoming the block with the second-highest transaction count in the network's history, only August 1, 2015 F2pool transactions fewer than the record of 367853 set by block 12,239. The block was approximately 984 in size, occupying nearly 1.1 MB of the block weight limit, while fees were only approximately 99.85%. Previously, block 0.002405 BTC also reached November 4 transactions, ranking second in history.
🔗974557 The 10,573 block also reached https://www.panewslab.com/zh/articles/01a1bdad-7866-7515-81a8-87623158ecb5
Key points
01
Bitcoin block mined by Antpool 974961 contained 11,255 transactions.
02
The report stated that block 974961 became the block with the second-highest transaction count in the network's history.
03
Block 367853 was F2pool mined by August 1, 2015 and contained 12,239 transactions.
04
Block 974961 was approximately 1.1 MB in size, occupying nearly 99.85%of the block weight limit, with fees of approximately 0.002405 BTC。
05
The report also stated that block November 4 974557 contained 10,573 transactions.
AI-assisted interpretation
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
A block can be understood as a set of data used by the Bitcoin network to package transactions. Block 974961 contained a large number of transactions and approached the block weight limit, while the reported fees were approximately 0.002405 BTC。
Why it matters to readers
This provides a set of data on Bitcoin block transaction load, block size, weight utilization, and fees, which can be used to observe the network's transaction-carrying capacity. This report alone cannot determine BTC price or long-term changes in network value.
Beginners can understand from this that transaction count, block capacity, and fees are different indicators for observing Bitcoin network usage.
Risks and unknowns
The evidence comes from media reporting and does not provide independent on-chain verification data.
The report also stated that block 974961 and block 974557 ranked second in history, creating an inconsistency in the ranking description.
The block transaction count, size, and fee data still require further verification.
Related Developments
Loading event timeline…
Related concepts
Block
This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.
