Supreme People’s Procuratorate discloses two personal-information crime cases settled in virtual currency
BIBIBI
AT A GLANCE
The Supreme People’s Procuratorate disclosed two personal-information black-and-gray-market cases, both involving the use of virtual currency for payment or settlement, with the amount involved exceeding 9400000 yuan.
Article
【Supreme People’s Procuratorate: Two personal-information black-and-gray-market operations settled transactions in virtual currency, involving more than 9400000 yuan】
The Supreme People’s Procuratorate released typical cases concerning the lawful protection of citizens’ personal information, including two related to the crypto industry. In Case One, Wang and others 11 people established a chain of “finding downstream buyers domestically—obtaining personal information overseas—reselling it domestically at a markup,” paying overseas upstream suppliers in virtual currency for the information. They resold citizens’ household-registration, financial-status, whereabouts and other information, involving more than 1980000 yuan. The court sentenced each defendant to fixed-term imprisonment of 3 years 6 months to 8 months, and imposed fines. In Case Seven, Lin Moufeng and others 21 people, under the pretext of recruitment, illegally obtained 870000 or more pieces of applicants’ personal information through online recruitment platforms and by bribing corporate human-resources personnel, and sold it overseas for profit. After the illegal proceeds were settled in virtual currency, they were converted into CNY; the amount involved exceeded 7460000 yuan. The court sentenced each defendant to fixed-term imprisonment of 5 years 3 months to 6 months, and ordered them to assume civil liability, including compensation for public-interest damage.
Key points
01
The Supreme People’s Procuratorate released typical cases concerning the lawful protection of citizens’ personal information, including two related to the crypto industry.
02
In Case One, Wang and others 11 people established a chain for obtaining and reselling personal information at a markup, and paid overseas upstream suppliers in virtual currency for the information.
03
Case One involved citizens’ household-registration, financial-status, whereabouts and other information; the amount involved exceeded 1980000 yuan.
04
The defendants in Case One were sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of 3 years 6 months to 8 months, and fined.
05
In Case Seven, Lin Moufeng and others 21 people illegally obtained applicants’ personal information, totaling 870000 or more pieces, and sold it overseas for profit.
06
The illegal proceeds in Case Seven were settled in virtual currency and then converted into CNY; the amount involved exceeded 7460000 yuan.
07
The defendants in Case Seven were sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of 5 years 3 months to 6 months, and ordered to assume civil liability, including compensation for public-interest damage.
AI-assisted interpretation
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
Both cases involved illegally obtaining or reselling personal information and using virtual currency in cross-border transactions: one used it to pay the cost of purchasing the information, while the other used it to settle the illegal proceeds and then converted them into CNY。
Why it matters to readers
The materials indicate that virtual currency was used for cross-border payments or fund settlement in illegal personal-information transactions; the defendants in both cases were also sentenced by the courts.
New users should note that virtual currency was merely the payment or settlement method described in the materials; the original text did not mention any specific currency, trading platform or new regulatory measures.
Risks and unknowns
The evidence came from a Telegram repost and did not include the Supreme People’s Procuratorate’s original announcement or the court documents; the specific case details still require verification.
The source text does not specify which virtual currencies or related service platforms were used.
The source text does not mention whether there are subsequent regulatory measures concerning virtual currency settlement or the deposit and withdrawal of funds.
