Article
playtesting every harness again, i cannot believe how you folks don't lose it over the TUI taking over 50ms to start, and TTFT >2s - these companies are achieving AGI and here we're stuck with the slowpoke harnesses wtf
X account: playtesting every harness again, i cannot believe how you folks don't lose it over the TUI taking over 50ms to start, and TTFT >2s - these companies are achieving AGI and here we're stuck with the slowpoke harnesses wtf
@gakonst Complained that some AI tools took more than 50 milliseconds to start, and that TTFT exceeded 2 seconds.
Key points
The poster stated that the startup time of some tools TUI exceeded 50 milliseconds.
The poster stated that TTFT exceeded 2 seconds.
The poster criticized the relevant harnesses for running slowly, using strongly emotional language.
AI-assisted interpretation
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
This is a personal comment, focusing on complaints about the startup speed and TTFT of AI tools. The original text does not specify the tools, testing methodology, or test environment.
Why it matters to readers
It reflects a poster's negative experience with the interaction speed of AI tools, but it cannot be used to assess the performance of the industry as a whole or of any specific tool.
It can be understood as follows: the poster believes that the time required for tools to open and begin producing output is too long.
Risks and unknowns
- It does not clearly identify any specific TUI, harness, or company.
- No testing methodology, test environment, or independent verification was provided.
- It cannot be confirmed whether these latencies are widespread.
Related Developments
Loading event timeline…