MarketPeopleSecurity
PeopleUnverified

CZ says all follows on his X account are manually operated

CorrectionCorrected the category and topic tags according to the website's section rules; the body text and review decision remain unchanged.

CZ_Binance replied, saying that its follows are all done manually, but it uses a tool to identify inactive accounts and occasionally unfollows.

Report

This content comes from the account CZ_Binance, with a timestamp of 2026-09-20 23:03:47, marked as a reply.

The reply target is @CryptoBestMood.

The original text states that all follows are manually operated.

The original text states that a tool is used to determine which accounts are inactive.

The original text states that it occasionally unfollows.

The text provides both Chinese and English versions.

The evidence includes a source link (Source).

Additional interpretation

This is a Telegram reply message. The sending account is shown as CZ_Binance, and the recipient/replied-to party is @CryptoBestMood. The content says only one thing: this account says that its following is done manually, but it uses a tool to find out which accounts are no longer active, and then unfollows after some time. The message repeats the same statement in both Chinese and English. The evidence does not mention the name of the tool, nor does it provide the original question being replied to or other context.

It shows a common way to maintain social media accounts: use a tool to filter inactive accounts and then clean up the following list. For readers who follow crypto information, this is merely a self-description of account operation habits and does not constitute any market judgment or investment basis.

Beginners can understand from this: on social platforms, "following" is merely account behavior; who follows you or whom you follow does not equal endorsement or investment advice. In addition, such self-descriptions cannot be externally verified, so one should remain cautious when seeing them.

It is impossible to confirm the real identities or affiliated organizations of CZ_Binance and @CryptoBestMood.

The mentioned "tool" is not given a name or link in the original text.

This is a first-person self-description, and there is no independent source in the evidence to verify it.

The original message being replied to is missing, so the context cannot be determined.

The timestamp only shows the time and does not indicate the time zone.

The content of the source link is not shown in the evidence.

Related Developments

Loading event timeline…