In the reply, Heyibinance accused people criticizing the company of exploiting the controversy for publicity and mentioned questions about Binance giving money to users. The statement did not provide specific, verifiable events or evidence.
🇨🇳 @jiangyizebaobao @Blackpink_Ox66 Why don’t you ask that person why 3 they keep picking fights to generate attention, disparaging and attacking my company, and questioning “Why does Binance have the right to give money to users?” and “You didn’t hit the elderly person, so why did you help them?” Because they themselves do not help, and are both stupid and malicious enough to lead a mob in buying planted articles and paid reposts?
🇺🇸@jiangyizebaobao @Blackpink_Ox66 Why don’t you ask that person why 3 they keep picking fights to generate attention, disparaging and attacking my company, and questioning “Why does Binance have the right to give money to users?” and “You didn’t hit the elderly person, so why did you help them?” Because they themselves do not help, and are both stupid and malicious enough to lead a mob in buying planted articles and paid reposts?
Key points
01
📢 Heyibinance [reply] | 🕒 2026-10-12 22:28:45
02
🔗 [Source]
03
🇨🇳 @jiangyizebaobao @Blackpink_Ox66 Why don’t you ask that person why 3 they keep picking fights to generate attention, disparaging and attacking my company, and questioning “Why does Binance have the right to give money to users?” and “You didn’t hit the elderly person, so why did you help them?” Because they themselves do not help, and are both stupid and malicious enough to lead a mob in buying planted articles and paid reposts?
04
🇺🇸 @jiangyizebaobao @Blackpink_Ox66 Why don’t you ask that person why 3 they keep picking fights to generate attention, disparaging and attacking my company, and questioning “Why does Binance have the right to give money to users?” and “You didn’t hit the elderly person, so why did you help them?” Because they themselves do not help, and are both stupid and malicious enough to lead a mob in buying planted articles and paid reposts?
AI-assisted interpretation
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
The content is a subjective, contentious reply reposted by a Telegram channel. It includes no specific distribution arrangements, amount, timing, or official document, so the matters concerned cannot be verified.
Why it matters to readers
Check the subsequent conditions of this event: whether Binance or a related entity has issued a formal statement, rules, or announcement regarding “giving money to users”; and whether specific, independently verifiable evidence of the controversy or a subsequent response has emerged
Risks and unknowns
Whether Binance or a related entity has issued a formal statement, rules, or announcement regarding “giving money to users”
Whether specific, independently verifiable evidence of the controversy or a subsequent response has emerged