DYORSWAP says the alleged GIWA Chain network incident caused approximately 766.25 ETH to be drained; more than 200 ETH
BIBIBI
AT A GLANCE
DYORSWAP says the incident originated from GIWA Chain 9134 and its bridging infrastructure, and that it has compensated more than 200 ETH。
Article
DYORSWAP: not DYOR contract attack; more than 200 ETH in compensation has been distributed
PANews September 28 reported that DYORSWAP issued a statement saying that the recent incident was not a DYOR contract attack; rather, its application was affected by a fraudulent network called “GIWA Chain 9134.” The network was initiated by an operator that manipulated bridging infrastructure and ultimately drained the real ETH supporting the network. Recovered data show that approximately 1335 addresses bridged funds, approximately 767.65 ETH entered the bridge, and ultimately approximately 766.25 ETH was drained;DYOR recorded 1479 operations on that chain, of which 1148 were successful, involving 298 wallets and 104 pools;DYOR has used its own funds to distribute more than 200 ETH in compensation to affected users. The team continues to trace the deployer, source of funds, batch-processing infrastructure, and destination of the drained funds, and to distinguish based on on-chain evidence...
(Click the link below to read the full article)
🔗https://www.panewslab.com/zh/articles/01a0e5af-140a-751d-923d-a3d804b3f1a1
Key points
01
DYORSWAP stated that the recent incident was not a DYOR contract attack; rather, its application was affected by “GIWA Chain 9134.”
02
The statement said that the network was initiated by an operator that manipulated bridging infrastructure and ultimately drained the real ETH。
03
Approximately 1335 addresses bridged funds; approximately 767.65 ETH entered the bridge, and ultimately approximately 766.25 ETH was drained.
04
DYOR There were 1479 recorded operations on that chain, of which 1148 were successful, involving 298 wallets and 104 pools.
05
DYOR More than 200 ETH in compensation has been distributed to affected users using its own funds.
06
The team continues to trace the deployer, source of funds, batch-processing infrastructure, and destination of the drained funds.
AI-assisted interpretation
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
This was not the DYOR contract being directly attacked, as stated; rather, the application was affected by a network called “GIWA Chain 9134” and its bridging infrastructure. After funds entered the bridge, approximately 766.25 ETH was drained; the project said it had compensated affected users more than 200 ETH。
Why it matters to readers
The incident involved ETH, bridged funds, and multiple wallets and liquidity pools, potentially affecting relevant users’ trust in fund security and infrastructure.
Bridging is a mechanism for transferring assets to another chain. The data here show that a large amount of ETH was drained after entering the bridge; users should monitor the project’s disclosures on the flow of funds and compensation progress.
Risks and unknowns
The original text does not provide final tracing conclusions regarding the deployer, source of funds, or destination of the drained funds.
The original text does not specify which users are covered by the more than 200 ETH in compensation, the specific amounts, or whether all compensation has been completed.
The attribution of responsibility and the amount of funds lost in the article are primarily based on DYORSWAP’s statement, with no independent verification information provided.
The content at the end of the original text is truncated, making it impossible to confirm the complete subsequent conclusion.
Related Developments
Loading event timeline…
Related concepts
Contracts
This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.
