Article
some external PRs are good
but many are slop - and we'd rather you just open an issue with the problem / your findings, vs us having to reverse engineer the issue / prompts from your PR
X account: some external PRs are good but many are slop - and we'd rather you just open an issue with the problem / your findings, vs us having to reverse engineer the issue / prompts from your PR
X account @gakonst indicates that some external PR PRs are good, but many are slop;PR the team would rather contributors directly submit the issue and their findings, instead of having to reverse engineer the issue PR and prompts from the PR.
Key points
some external PRs are good
but many are slop - and we'd rather you just open an issue with the problem / your findings, vs us having to reverse engineer the issue / prompts from your PR
AI-assisted interpretation
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
This is the X account's @gakonst direct statement of its preference for handling external PR contributions, but it provides no details about the projects involved, specific PR submission procedures, or subsequent policy details.
Why it matters to readers
Verify the follow-up conditions for this event: whether the account or related project has published more specific guidelines for external contributions, Issue, or PR PR submissions.
Risks and unknowns
- Whether the account or related project has published more specific guidelines for external contributions, Issue, or PR PR submissions.
Related Developments
Loading event timeline…