NEAR Intents Lead says over 50000000 USD of Bitget hacker's transfer attempts were intercepted
BIBIBI
AT A GLANCE
NEAR Intents Lead says it intercepted over 50000000 USD in transfer attempts by the Bitget hacker.
Article
NEAR Intents intercepted over 50000000 USD transfer attempts, with only 166000 USD passing
PANews September 29 reported that NEAR Intents lead Alex Shevchenko stated that the Bitget hacker had attempted to transfer over NEAR Intents in funds, but only 50000000 USD passed through 166000 USD, while 503000 USD was frozen during execution. Shevchenko said the interception mainly relied on NEAR Intents risk intelligence layer SHIELD, which can automatically detect abnormal fund flows and identify transactions related to hackers, thereby rejecting quotes or halting execution. He said that NEAR Intents opposes laundering stolen assets and has waived the 5% +5%bounty set by Bitget so that Bitget can recover as much of the funds as possible.
PANews September 29 reported NEAR Intents lead Alex Shevchenko's statement.
02
Alex Shevchenko said that the Bitget hacker had attempted to transfer NEAR Intents over 50000000 USD。
03
Alex Shevchenko said that only 166000 USD passed through, while another 503000 USD was frozen during execution.
04
Alex Shevchenko said the interception mainly relied on the risk intelligence layer SHIELD to automatically detect abnormal fund flows and identify transactions related to hackers, thereby rejecting quotes or halting execution.
05
Alex Shevchenko said that NEAR Intents opposes laundering stolen assets and has waived the 5% +5%bounty.
AI-assisted interpretation
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
In simple terms, a NEAR Intents lead said that a hacker had attempted to use the system to transfer a large amount of funds, but most of the transfers failed to complete. He said that the system's SHIELD checks abnormal fund flows and rejects quotes or stops execution for transactions identified as related to hackers.
Why it matters to readers
If these claims are accurate, the interception could limit further transfers of the stolen funds and give Bitget an opportunity to recover more funds.
Beginners should note that this is a security incident report issued by a project lead and then relayed by the media; “frozen” does not mean that the funds have been returned, nor can this report alone determine the security or price trend of the relevant platform or token.
Risks and unknowns
The original text does not provide verifiable on-chain transaction records.
The original source did not provide confirmation from Bitget or any other independent party regarding the amount and freeze status.
503000 USD The final disposition after the freeze and whether the funds can be recovered remain unclear.
Exceeding 50000000 USD the attempted transfer amount and 166000 USD、503000 USD the specific handling of the remaining funds between them has not been disclosed.
5%+5%'s specific bounty rules and method of waiving it were not explained.
Related Developments
Loading event timeline…
Related concepts
NEAR Intents
This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.
