CZ_Binance The relevant statement was not profanity; the dispute arose from differing translations of “damn.”
Article
💬 CZ_Binance [reply] · 🕒 10:34:42
🇨🇳 @Jz_kuku @linmumu223 It was not profanity; it did not go that far.
A translation issue—“damn” is probably better rendered as “oh my” 🤣 🇺🇸 @Jz_kuku @linmumu223 Didn't swear, not to that extent
It's a translation issue, "damn" is probably better translated as "damn" 🤣
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
Binance: This reply primarily clarifies the translation of the wording and does not indicate any direct impact on Binance business, assets, or operations.
Why it matters to readers
The content was relayed from Telegram and included an X link, with no independent verification provided; the incident concerns only clarification of wording and translation, with limited substantive impact.
Subject of interest:Binance. Observation period: short term
Risks and unknowns
Verify the original X reply and its context corresponding to the link.
Monitor whether further clarification or an escalation of the dispute emerges.
Binance Conditions that would reverse the impact assessment: if the original X reply is confirmed to be fabricated, or subsequent content reveals a more substantive dispute, the assessment must be adjusted.