Article
I do find some folks say this in private, the issue is it requires running an extreme gauntlet in the courts.
And per an earlier tweet, I think Dems are dozens of votes short of court-packing for the next decade.
Loading…
X account @jbsdc said that some individuals privately support the relevant position, but its implementation would require court review; the Democratic Party is still dozens of votes short of advancing an expansion of the Supreme Court over the next years.
I do find some folks say this in private, the issue is it requires running an extreme gauntlet in the courts.
And per an earlier tweet, I think Dems are dozens of votes short of court-packing for the next decade.
I do find some folks say this in private, the issue is it requires running an extreme gauntlet in the courts.
And per an earlier tweet, I think Dems are dozens of votes short of court-packing for the next decade.
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
U.S. political and judicial systems: If proposals such as expanding the size of the Supreme Court make tangible progress, they could increase institutional and policy uncertainty; this is currently only an individual's judgment, and its actual impact on policy or markets cannot be confirmed.
The content reflects an individual's judgment from a social media account and provides no independent sources or verifiable evidence; it discusses arrangements in the U.S. judicial and political systems, with no clearly documented policy action having occurred to date.
Subject of focus: U.S. political and judicial systems. Observation period: medium to long term
Loading event timeline…