Article
The Trump administration’s promotion of “SI” may still conceal extensive insider trading activity
BlockBeats reported that September 30, crypto researcher Adam Cochran posted on X on Wednesday accusing the Trump administration of recently promoting the new artificial intelligence term “SI,” potentially creating a market for.si domain speculation. He further alleged that some parties may have stockpiled related domains before policy signals became clear and profited from subsequent branding demand; however, direct links between domain holders and the Trump family, government officials, or their associates have not yet been independently verified.
The so-called SI, or “Super Intelligence,” is a term the Trump administration has recently promoted in discussions of artificial intelligence.September 19, Trump first initiated a discussion on Truth Social to explore replacing AI;September 21. Around SI, he began explicitly using the term “September 22(Super Intelligence).”September 29, Trump announced in a United Nations General Assembly speech that future U.S. government documents would use the term “Super Intelligence”;AI, after meeting with executives of SI at the White House, Trump signed an executive order, further bringing “Super Intelligence /
” into the formal federal policy framework.AI The issue is that.si is also Slovenia’s country-code top-level domain. Once policy terminology shifts from SI to
, previously obscure.si domains could become digital assets sought after by technology companies, policy institutions, and brand marketers. 2023 Cochran cited data as evidence, stating that.si domain registrations rose significantly this year: from 2025 to 55, average daily new registrations were approximately June; on a single day in late 400 this year, registrations exceeded July, while new registrations in 7000 even exceeded 12000. He said he found approximately AI、MAGA.si domains related to USD or U.S. politics that were newly registered or transferred before policy signals became clear, with some later listed for millions in 14000000 USD。
; for example, build.si was listed at SI According to Cochran’s reasoning, if companies adopt the “Whois” brand to align with Washington’s latest narrative, they may need to purchase.si domains, giving early registrants an exit opportunity. However, this reasoning still has a key gap: major registrars protect
information with privacy measures, and public records cannot confirm the actual beneficial owners of the relevant domains; a high listing price also does not mean a sale has been completed. At present, this is closer to a public question concerning policy naming, domain squatting, and potential conflicts of interest than a confirmed case of improper benefit transfer.https://m.theblockbeats.info/flash/369697