ESMA Added 9 entities CASP, bringing the total number of registrations to 375 entities; Shenzhen Economic Investigation warns of RWA scam risks
BIBIBI
AT A GLANCE
The report states that ESMA added 9 entities CASP to 375 entities, while Shenzhen Economic Investigation also warned against RWA scams such as real estate tokenization.
Article
Key information from last night and this morning (October 19 to October 20）
ESMA added 9 crypto-asset service providers, bringing the total to 375 European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) added crypto-asset service providers (MiCA) to its register under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (CASP), including BingX's Austrian entity MEGE zweite, YouHodler's Italian subsidiary, and Openbank Deutschland, a Santander subsidiary, bringing the total number of registrations CASP to 375 entities. Shenzhen Economic Investigation: Beware of “RWA real estate tokenization” and “blockchain evidence preservation” scams. The Economic Crime Investigation Bureau of the Shenzhen Public Security Bureau issued a reminder to beware of new scams packaged as “RWA real estate tokenization” and “blockchain evidence preservation.” The bureau noted that technical terminology ≠ a trust endorsement. Technology practitioners can easily mistake “tech...
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)MiCA register added 9 crypto-asset service providers (CASP）。
02
The article states that the total number of CASP registrations has increased to 375 entities.
03
The additions include BingX's Austrian entity MEGE zweite, YouHodler's Italian subsidiary, and Openbank Deutschland, a Santander subsidiary.
04
The Economic Crime Investigation Bureau of the Shenzhen Public Security Bureau warned against new scams packaged as “RWA real estate tokenization” and “blockchain evidence preservation.”
05
Shenzhen Economic Investigation stated: “Technical terminology ≠ a trust endorsement.”
AI-assisted interpretation
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
One item concerns changes in the number of service providers on the European MiCA register; the other is a scam-risk alert issued by Shenzhen Economic Investigation. The original text of the second item is truncated, so no determination can be made regarding any specific project or case.
Why it matters to readers
Changes to the register can be used to monitor MiCA the registration status of crypto-asset service providers under the framework; the police reminder indicates that the use of technical terms such as RWA or blockchain alone cannot establish the credibility of related promotional claims.
When newcomers encounter projects marketed around real estate tokenization or blockchain evidence preservation, they should not judge credibility based solely on technical names; they should also distinguish between “appearing on a register” and “an investment carrying no risk.”
Risks and unknowns
The evidence consists only of an information summary and does not include the original ESMA register.
The Shenzhen Economic Investigation section is truncated at “Technology practitioners can easily mistake ‘tech...,” and the complete explanation is unknown.
The original text does not disclose any specific scam projects, implicated parties, or loss data.
This summary alone cannot confirm the effective scope of the newly added registrations or the specific business activities of each entity.
Related Developments
Loading event timeline…
Related concepts
ESMA
This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.
