Article
I agree with this but get ready to hear two lines a lot in the Lame Duck:
1) “A bad bill is better than no bill.”
2): “It’s very rare that a bill gets changed just a few years after passing.”
Loading…
X account @jbsdc, and during the Lame Duck period, supporters may repeatedly emphasize passing the bill first and making few changes in the short term.
I agree with this but get ready to hear two lines a lot in the Lame Duck:
1) “A bad bill is better than no bill.”
2): “It’s very rare that a bill gets changed just a few years after passing.”
I agree with this but get ready to hear two lines a lot in the Lame Duck:
1) “A bad bill is better than no bill.”
2): “It’s very rare that a bill gets changed just a few years after passing.”
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
Unspecified bill and related industry: if the relevant bill has indeed entered the Lame Duck period, pushing to pass it first rather than continuing to amend it could affect subsequent regulatory or policy frameworks; however, the original text does not explain the bill’s content, so its specific direction cannot be determined.
This is the X account’s personal opinion on legislative strategy and lobbying rhetoric; it does not identify a specific bill or provide verifiable official progress.
Focus: unspecified bill and related industry. Observation period: short to medium term
Loading event timeline…