X account: arXiv just announced a limit of two papers per submitter per calendar month. But what it needs to do is economize on moderation—not on scholarship. As a market-design scholar and arXiv contributor of almost 20 years, I think this policy confuses the two. 🧵
X account @skominers name, arXiv announced that each submitter may submit a maximum of two papers per calendar month, and criticized the policy for potentially conflating review-resource issues with limits on academic output.
Article
arXiv just announced a limit of two papers per submitter per calendar month.
But what it needs to do is economize on moderation—not on scholarship. As a market-design scholar and arXiv contributor of almost 20 years, I think this policy confuses the two. 🧵
Key points
01
arXiv just announced a limit of two papers per submitter per calendar month.
02
But what it needs to do is economize on moderation—not on scholarship. As a market-design scholar and arXiv contributor of almost 20 years, I think this policy confuses the two. 🧵
AI-assisted interpretation
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
The information comes from X account @skominers's account of the arXiv policy; no official announcement or other independent evidence was provided. The content has no direct connection to the specified asset of interest.
Why it matters to readers
Verify the follow-up conditions for this event: whether arXiv publishes an official announcement specifying the scope of application, effective date, and exception rules for the submission limit; and whether arXiv provides further clarification on review-resource allocation and subsequent adjustments to this policy.
Risks and unknowns
Whether arXiv publishes an official announcement specifying the scope of application, effective date, and exception rules for the submission limit.
Whether arXiv provides further clarification on review-resource allocation and subsequent adjustments to this policy.