The post claims that “nearly ” of public chains have become “zombie chains.”
02
The post claims that Helium, Lisk, and others have exited one after another.
03
The post claims that Solana and Ethereum monopolize transactions and funds.
04
The post includes a link to a PANews article.
AI-assisted interpretation
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
This text argues that a large number of public chains have already shown a lack of active engagement, while transactions and funds are mainly concentrated in Solana and Ethereum. However, the provided text contains only generalized conclusions and does not present the statistical process or specific data.
Why it matters to readers
If these claims are valid, competition for transactions and funds among public chains may be shifting toward a small number of projects; however, the available evidence is insufficient to determine the degree or persistence of this concentration.
Beginners should not make judgments based solely on generalized wording such as “nearly ” or “monopolize”; they should first review the statistical definitions, sample, and data sources.
Risks and unknowns
The definition of “zombie chain” is not explained.
The sample scope, statistical period, and calculation method for “nearly ” are not provided.
The specific meaning and basis of Helium and Lisk having “exited” are unclear.
No data on Solana and Ethereum transaction or fund shares was provided.
The given text cannot verify whether the relevant conclusions remain valid.
Related Developments
Loading event timeline…
Related concepts
Public chains
This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.