bibibi.ccLoading…
X account @gakonst claims to have integrated Nanocode with the @trycua backend, and states that its frontend is compatible with the interface expected by Codex.
I've added a @trycua backend to Nanocode which has the same frontend as Codex expects mcp_cua_repl__js etc - i've come to realize that that API incl the internals (cua.getState, getApp etc.) are the interesting things you need and the Sky backend is less critical- the awesome browser extension w/ the tab groups etc you can trivially rebuild
https://t.co/dQWkeM8jHw
I've added a @trycua backend to Nanocode which has the same frontend as Codex expects mcp_cua_repl__js etc - i've come to realize that that API incl the internals (cua.getState, getApp etc.) are the interesting things you need and the Sky backend is less critical- the awesome browser extension w/ the tab groups etc you can trivially rebuild
https://t.co/dQWkeM8jHw
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
The content consists of a single X post and provides no independently verifiable release announcement, code repository, or official statement; the event has no direct connection to assets on the policy watchlist.
Follow-up conditions for this event: whether Nanocode,@trycua or Codex publishes verifiable code, documentation, or a formal statement; whether the backend’s compatibility scope and actual usability are independently verified.
Loading event timeline…