Arthur Hayes stated AI A slowdown in computing power demand could trigger debt risks and prompt U.S. liquidity expansion

AT A GLANCE

Arthur Hayes believes that, whether the U.S. government buys computing power or bails out insurance companies, it will ultimately print money and benefit Bitcoin.

Article

Arthur Hayes：AI“Safety First” is actually the destruction of computing demand; every choice by the U.S. government to end the crisis amounts to money printing, ultimately benefiting Bitcoin

BlockBeats reports,September 22, Arthur Hayes published a new long-form article, “Safety First.” Its core argument is that Anthropic, OpenAI, and SpaceX claim that “safety first” is guiding them to slow down AGI development, not out of concern for human well-being, but because of economic realities. The market does not want AI, but rather wants the AI at “Chinese prices,” meaning it needs intelligence that is 100 times cheaper than it is today. Hayes argues that “safety first” is essentially the destruction of computing demand: if the cost of training new models falls and laboratories shift toward efficiency optimization, customers will spend less on computing. Meanwhile, the three major AI laboratories generate no profits, yet their computing demand supports over 1000000000000 USD of investment-grade debt and hundreds of billions in USD low-quality debt. These debts rely on profitable technology companies such as NVIDIA, Broadcom, Google, and Microsoft to provide off-balance-sheet backing.

The real bagholders are U.S. insurance policyholders. Hayes cites an analysis by Nick Nameth that exposes a “self-insurance scam”:PE giants (Apollo,KKR, Brookfield, and others) acquire insurers, then place AI data-center debt and SaaS private credit affected by AI shocks into insurance assets, before using affiliated captive reinsurers to provide fictitious backing with minimal capital. Nameth estimates that the total value of these fictitious reinsurance assets has reached 1540000000000 USD. Once AI data-center debt is downgraded by ratings agencies because of insufficient computing demand, insurers will be forced to add capital, while affiliated reinsurers will be unable to pay, rendering the insurers insolvent. In most U.S. states, insurance protection limits are only 250000 to 300000 USD, and surviving insurers pay into protection funds only after the fact, encouraging all participants to maximize risk-taking. 2008 year, when AIG was bailed out,TARP funds ultimately flowed to Goldman Sachs and generated record bonuses, while ordinary people received only foreclosure notices. Hayes believes this scene will be repeated.

For crypto investors, the conclusion is a win-win. If the U.S. government chooses to become the “buyer of last resort for computing,” it will print money in the name of national security to subsidize unproductive economic goods, driving up financial speculation and the price of Bitcoin. If the government instead chooses to bail out insolvent insurers, it will likewise need to print money to cover bad AI debt, increasing the money supply and pushing up Bitcoin.

Key points

BlockBeats reported that Arthur Hayes September 22 published the long-form article “Safety First.”
Hayes believes that Anthropic, OpenAI, and SpaceX claim that “safety comes first” and are slowing AGI development because of economic realities.
Hayes interpreted “safety comes first” as a decline in demand for computing power, saying that customers may spend less on computing power.
Hayes cited Nick Nameth’s analysis; Nameth estimated that the total value of the related fraudulent reinsurance assets reached 1540000000000 USD。
Hayes believes that whether the U.S. government becomes the “buyer of last resort for computing power” or bails out insolvent insurance companies, either would increase the money supply and drive up Bitcoin.
Hayes stated that commercial banks have created more than 100000000000 USD money, and interest rate hikes give banks an additional 7500000000 USD in interest on excess reserves each year.

AI-assisted interpretation

The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.

This content conveys Hayes’s market view: if AI computing-power demand is insufficient, the related debt and insurance assets could come under pressure; he expects the government to support computing-power construction with newly created money or address insurers’ losses, and therefore believes Bitcoin and some altcoins could benefit.

Why it matters to readers

The article AI links data center debt, the insurance system, the US money supply, and crypto-asset prices, presenting a narrative that could affect Bitcoin market performance.

Beginners should treat this as a personal opinion rather than a certain prediction. Claims in the article concerning debt scale, reinsurance risks, money creation, and rising crypto prices all require independent verification and should not be used directly as investment grounds.

Risks and unknowns

The original summary does not provide complete evidence for the profits of the three major AI laboratories, the scale of the related debt, or claims of off-balance-sheet backing.
1540000000000 USD The purported reinsurance assets are Nick Nameth's estimate; the calculation methodology and data sources are not presented in the materials.
Whether insurers will become insolvent, and whether the government will provide a bailout or purchase computing power, are both projections of events that have not yet occurred.
There is no certainty that newly created money will drive up Bitcoin and certain altcoins.

Arthur Hayes stated AI A slowdown in computing power demand could trigger debt risks and prompt U.S. liquidity expansion

Article

AI-assisted interpretation

Why it matters to readers

Risks and unknowns

Related Developments

Related concepts

Keep following

Security Center