Ignas said that FOMO over the past 7 days, the Hyperliquid Builder integration generated approximately 320000 USD in fees
BIBIBI
AT A GLANCE
Ignas said that,FOMO in the past 7 days, the Hyperliquid Builder integration generated approximately 320000 USD in fees, ranking second.
Article
Ignas：FOMO In the past 7 days, through the Hyperliquid Builder integration, generated 320000 USD in fees
PANews September 24 reported that DeFi researcher Ignas wrote that,FOMO in the past 7 days, the Hyperliquid Builder integration generated approximately 320000 USD in fees, ranking second only to Phantom and placing second. Ignas said this fully demonstrates the FOMO adoption among retail users, adding that he had not previously promoted a FOMO referral link.
PANews September 24 reported Ignas's related remarks.
02
Ignas stated that,FOMO in the past 7 days, the Hyperliquid Builder integration generated approximately 320000 USD in fees.
03
Ignas stated that,FOMO ranked second only to Phantom, placing second.
04
Ignas believes that this reflects the FOMO adoption among retail users.
05
Ignas stated that he had not previously promoted a FOMO referral link.
AI-assisted interpretation
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
The core of this report is that Ignas claims FOMO with the help of the Hyperliquid Builder integration, over the past 7 days, approximately 320000 USD in fees was generated, ranking second in the relevant rankings. The statement regarding retail adoption is Ignas's assessment.
Why it matters to readers
If the relevant fees and ranking are accurate, these data may be used to observe FOMO usage activity generated through the Hyperliquid Builder integration; however, the original text provides only Ignas's statement.
Beginners may treat this as a unilateral report concerning FOMO fee performance and ranking, and should not assess the project's adoption solely based on this report.
Risks and unknowns
The original text does not provide the methodology for calculating the fee data or the underlying statistics.
The original text does not explain the full scope or specific criteria of the relevant ranking.
The claim of approximately 320000 USD in fees and a second-place ranking cannot yet be independently verified from the evidence provided.
“Reflects adoption among retail users” is Ignas's assessment; no specific user data is provided as evidence.
Related Developments
Loading event timeline…
Related concepts
fees
This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.
