bibibi.ccLoading…
In the response, Heyibinance stated that any party could have a “shady past” and questioned why Binance would use funds to subsidize users. This content is a personal opinion and provides no verifiable evidence.
📢 Heyibinance [reply] | 🕒 2026-10-12 19:54:55 🔗 [Source]
🇨🇳 @qkl521 @CryptoSpill Who doesn't have a shady past when it comes to their own affairs? Binance taking money to subsidize users is like saying, “If there’s nothing wrong, why are they paying out?” 👏 🇺🇸@qkl521 @CryptoSpill Who doesn't have a shady past when it comes to their own affairs? Binance taking money to subsidize users is like saying, “If there’s nothing wrong, why are they paying out?” 👏
📢 Heyibinance [reply] | 🕒 2026-10-12 19:54:55
🔗 [Source]
🇨🇳 @qkl521 @CryptoSpill Who doesn't have a shady past when it comes to their own affairs?
Binance taking money to subsidize users is like saying, “If there’s nothing wrong, why are they paying out?”
👏
🇺🇸 @qkl521 @CryptoSpill Who doesn't have a shady past when it comes to their own affairs?
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
Binance The response may increase negative discussion surrounding Binance’s motivation for subsidizing users, but it is merely a personal opinion and contains no verifiable new facts.
Subject of interest:Binance. Observation period: short term
Loading event timeline…