Telegram records show that CZ_Binance the reply @andyyy said that they had not previously known the person’s background and expressed pleasure at completing a brief interview.
🇨🇳 @andyyy I previously did not know your background. Thank you for being so thoughtful. I have to hurry to my next meeting, but I’m glad we could do a brief interview. 🙏
🇺🇸@andyyy I previously did not know this background. Thank you for being so thoughtful. I have to hurry to my next meeting, but I’m glad we completed a brief interview. 🙏
Key points
01
📢 CZ_Binance [reply] | 🕒 2026-10-27 05:29:55
02
🔗 [Source]
03
🇨🇳 @andyyy I previously did not know your background. Thank you for being so thoughtful. I have to hurry to my next meeting, but I’m glad we could do a brief interview. 🙏
04
🇺🇸 @andyyy Didn’t know that background. Thanks for making such an effort. I had to rush to the next meeting, but glad we got a short interview in. 🙏
AI-assisted interpretation
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
BNB: The reply concerned only a brief interview and disclosed no Binance business, regulatory, product, or funding-related information; no clear tradable impact was identified.
Why it matters to readers
The information comes from a forwarded Telegram record, with no original social media link or interview content attached; the only confirmable information is the text of the reply included. It concerns a different triggering event from “follow Andy” among the candidates and cannot be merged.
Subject of focus:BNB. Observation period: short term
Risks and unknowns
Whether the full original reply or interview was made public
Whether the interview included Binance、BNB substantive business or regulatory information
BNB Countervailing condition affecting the assessment: if a subsequent interview discloses material business, regulatory, or financial information related to Binance or BNB.