Binance The theft-related address borrowed approximately from Aave borrowed approximately 19800 tokens ETH and transferred
BIBIBI
AT A GLANCE
The report stated that Binance the theft-related address deposited approximately into Aave deposited approximately 60000000 tokens USDT, borrowed 19762 tokens ETH and continued transferring assets.ETH。
Article
🔍 On-chain Detective | Data:Binance An address associated with the theft borrowed approximately Aave 19800 tokens ETH According to BlockBeats,October 30, an address associated with the Binance hot-wallet theft incident deposited approximately Aave 60000000 tokens USDT and borrowed 19762 tokens ETH(approximately 44700000 USD). Etherscan data shows that the address has been labeled “Binance Hot Wallet Exploiter 3” and began approving transactions and depositing funds into October 30 at Beijing time on the 04: 57. It subsequently borrowed approximately Aave V3 in transactions, and transferred a total of USDT tokens 19762 to another theft-associated address.
Original link ETH 23314.5 ETH https://m.theblockbeats.info/flash/374501
Key points
01
BlockBeats stated that October 30, an address associated with the Binance hot wallet theft incident deposited approximately into Aave deposited approximately 60000000 tokens USDT。
02
The address borrowed 19762 tokens ETH, reportedly equivalent to approximately 44700000 USD。
03
Etherscan data shows that the address is labeled “Binance Hot Wallet Exploiter 3”。
04
The report states that the address began approving transactions and depositing funds into October 30 at Beijing time on the 04: 57.Aave V3 USDT。
05
The address subsequently borrowed approximately 19762 tokens ETH in transactions and transferred a total of 23314.5 tokens ETH to another theft-related address.
AI-assisted interpretation
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
Simply put, the related address cited in the report first deposited USDT into Aave V3, then borrowed ETH, and transferred more ETH to another wallet described as a theft-related address.
Why it matters to readers
The materials indicate that the theft-related address is still conducting large-scale borrowing and asset transfers; therefore, the subsequent destination of the relevant funds warrants attention.
Beginners should distinguish between “an on-chain transfer occurred” and “address ownership has been confirmed”: these materials cite address labels and on-chain data, but do not provide an address or transaction hash for independent verification.
Risks and unknowns
The materials do not provide specific addresses or transaction hashes, so transaction details cannot be independently verified based on the available evidence.
The actual connection between the address and the Binance hot wallet theft incident, as well as its ownership, is not further substantiated in the materials.
The materials do not explain the subsequent destination of the transferred ETH, nor whether it has been sold, frozen, or recovered.
The materials do not state whether Aave V3 experienced anomalies, liquidation, or bad debt.
The date in the report does not specify a year.
Related Developments
Loading event timeline…
Related concepts
Hot wallet
A wallet kept connected to the internet for convenience, better suited to everyday scenarios such as frequent transactions.
