CZ_Binance The Chinese response said that he had never said anything about selling SPCX the stock, but only showed funds he might know about to ease concerns.
π¨π³ @heyibinance @elonmusk @HuaweiMate6π Never said anything about selling SPCX the stock; he only said/showed some funds he may know about, so he could worry less. πΊπΈ @heyibinance @elonmusk @HuaweiMate6 π did say anything about selling SPCX shares, was just saying/showing some funds that he might know, so that he can be less worried.
π¨π³ @heyibinance @elonmusk @HuaweiMate6π Never said anything about selling SPCX the stock; he only said/showed some funds he may know about, so he could worry less.
04
πΊπΈ @heyibinance @elonmusk @HuaweiMate6 π did say anything about selling SPCX shares, was just saying/showing some funds that he might know, so that he can be less worried.
05
SPCX
AI-assisted interpretation
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
SPCX: If the Chinese wording is accurate, the clarification could reduce pressure from selling rumors; however, the English content contains a semantic conflict, making the direction of the impact uncertain.
Why it matters to readers
This is forwarded Telegram content; the original Chinese text denies selling SPCX, but the English paragraph lacks a negation, creating a translation conflict, so the original meaning cannot be fully confirmed.
Subject of focus:SPCX. Observation period: short term
Risks and unknowns
Verify CZ_Binance the original response and complete context
Monitor SPCX whether abnormal fluctuations related to selling rumors occur
SPCX Reverse condition affecting the assessment: a complete original response or subsequent clarification appears, proving that the actual statement was to sell or not to sell SPCX the stock.