bibibi.ccLoading…
The opinion holds that backend services should provide structured-feedback endpoints, with another agent able to draft requests when they are reasonable PR。
Every backend service should have a /feedback endpoint.
Agents are quickly becoming the heaviest users of most APIs. When one hits a missing feature or a bug, it should be able to say so right there, in a structured way.
If the request makes sense, another agent drafts the PR https://t.co/1gPSviXypu
The original text argues that every backend service should set up a “/feedback” endpoint.
The original text states that when agents encounter missing features or vulnerabilities, they should be able to provide feedback directly in a structured format.
The original text states that, if a request is reasonable, another agent can draft it PR。
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
The author envisions adding a unified feedback entry point to backend services. When agents call the API endpoint and discover missing features or vulnerabilities, they can submit structured feedback; reasonable requests can also be assigned to another agent to draft a PR.
This approach is intended to connect agents’ discovery of issues, submission of feedback, and drafting of PRs PR into a single workflow, but the original text only makes a recommendation and does not demonstrate actual implementation or results.
Beginners can understand “/feedback” as a dedicated API entry point for receiving issue reports, and PR as a request to submit code changes for review.
Loading event timeline…
This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.
View glossary →This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.
View glossary →This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.
View glossary →