bibibiLoading…
A secondary account says that surveyed institutions did not reduce their allocations during the crypto market retracement and that they commonly held Bitcoin.
Bitwise In-Depth Report: 10 New Trends in Institutional Crypto Investment
During a roughly 50% retracement in the crypto market, none of the surveyed institutions with crypto holdings reduced their crypto asset allocations, while Bitcoin was their only common holding.
Source: https://www.panewslab.com/zh/articles/01a0d21b-92f5-7707-8912-22dedaa4173f
The material says that this content comes from the “Bitwise In-Depth Report: 10 New Trends in Institutional Crypto Investment.”
The material says that during a roughly 50% retracement in the crypto market, none of the surveyed institutions with crypto holdings reduced their crypto asset allocations.
The material says that Bitcoin was the only common holding among these institutions.
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
This material summarizes a report on trends in institutional investment in crypto assets. According to the material, even when the market retraced by roughly 50%, the surveyed institutions did not reduce their allocations; Bitcoin was the asset they held in common.
If these accounts are accurate, the content reflects the surveyed institutions’ allocations during that retracement and indicates that Bitcoin was held in common among the surveyed institutions.
It helps beginners understand that “institutional allocation” refers to an institution holding or directing funds to invest in a particular type of asset, while a “retracement” is a decline in price from a higher level.
Loading event timeline…
This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.
View glossary →This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.
View glossary →This term is not in the glossary yet. Browse related concepts in the glossary.
View glossary →