bibibi.ccLoadingβ¦
CZ_Binance Expressed regret over an unnamed incident, saying that the relevant parties may not understand the local policy, and noting that a similar situation occurred less than 1 years ago.
π’ CZ_Binance [quote] | π 2026-10-16 12:21:30 π [Source]
π¨π³ What a pity. It seems they really do not understand the local policy? But this is not the first time; a similar incident also occurred less than 1 years ago: πΊπΈ Sad to see. Looks like they really didn't know the local policies? But it's not the first time either, same thing happened less than a year ago: https://t.co/c2lI8p2r9w https://t.co/n2Zv1hpIyZ
π’ CZ_Binance [quote] | π 2026-10-16 12:21:30
π [Source]
π¨π³ What a pity. It seems they really do not understand the local policy? But this is not the first time; a similar incident also occurred less than 1 years ago:
πΊπΈ Sad to see. Looks like they really didn't know the local policies? But it's not the first time either, same thing happened less than a year ago: https://t.co/c2lI8p2r9w https://t.co/n2Zv1hpIyZ
The following is analysis, separate from reported facts. Verify important claims independently.
Binance: The statement regarding insufficient understanding of local policy may slightly increase external attention to the relevant compliance risks, but the subject of the incident and factual background are unclear.
Information relayed via Telegram from CZ_Binance the quoted content does not specify the particular incident, parties involved, or local policy, and lacks verifiable original context.
Subject of interest:Binance. Observation period: short term
Loading event timelineβ¦